Russell's Paradox
"define a set R = { x : x ∉ x }
So, does R belong to R?
If R belongs to R, then R is not a member of itself, ie. R ∉ R.
If R ∉ R, the R belongs to itself.
In either case, we have a contradiction. "
extracted and modified from "Set Theory, Thomas Jech, and Springer."
ngng,簡單黎講,一個唔係自己既自己,屬唔屬於自己
如果屬於自己,咁姐係自己唔係自己
如果唔屬於自己,咁姐係自己係自己
兩者都有邏輯謬誤,所以呢個「唔係自己既自己」,係冇意思既文字
呢種"intuitive notation of set",叫做
Axiom Schema of Comprehension,不過名唔係咁重要
係Pure Mathematics 2007年Paper 1既Marking Scheme
出左個咁既答案:

形式係同 Russell's Paradox 相似
不過唔知眾AL考生,被AL強姦時有冇諗過呢D野
沒有留言:
發佈留言